Foot Posture Index
This was originally develeoped by Tony Redmond as a means to overcome some of the limitations of previous methods of quantifying posture of the foot.
We have two recent publications in which we used it in:
Static Stance Response to Different Types of Foot Orthoses
The Reliability of the Manual Supination Resistance Test
Another 2 papers from the University of South Australia has just appeared look more at the FPI validity:
Criterion Validation of Four Criteria of the Foot Posture Index
Reliability of the Foot Posture Index and Traditional Measures of Foot Position
My opinion on the Foot Posture Index (FPI):
We use it a lot in research. We use it a lot as part of the inclusion criteria for our orthotic studies (eg we may only recruit those with a Foot Posture Index greater than, say, 6 --> this probably indicates that these people would have probably got foot orthotics if they had symptoms related to a pronated foot --> anything >4-5 on the Foot Posture Index is a pronated foot). The the end of the day, the Foot Posture Index is good for what it is designed for. Like a lot of tools its not good for what it is not designed for.
Back to home
Saturday, January 17, 2004
Foot Posture Index
This was originally develeoped by Tony Redmond as a means to overcome some of the limitations of previous methods of quantifying posture of the foot.
We have two recent publications in which we used it in:
Static Stance Response to Different Types of Foot Orthoses
The Reliability of the Manual Supination Resistance Test
Another 2 papers from the University of South Australia has just appeared look more at the FPI validity:
Criterion Validation of Four Criteria of the Foot Posture Index
Reliability of the Foot Posture Index and Traditional Measures of Foot Position
My opinion on the Foot Posture Index (FPI):
We use it a lot in research. We use it a lot as part of the inclusion criteria for our orthotic studies (eg we may only recruit those with a Foot Posture Index greater than, say, 6 --> this probably indicates that these people would have probably got foot orthotics if they had symptoms related to a pronated foot --> anything >4-5 on the Foot Posture Index is a pronated foot). The the end of the day, the Foot Posture Index is good for what it is designed for. Like a lot of tools its not good for what it is not designed for.
Back to home
This was originally develeoped by Tony Redmond as a means to overcome some of the limitations of previous methods of quantifying posture of the foot.
We have two recent publications in which we used it in:
Static Stance Response to Different Types of Foot Orthoses
The Reliability of the Manual Supination Resistance Test
Another 2 papers from the University of South Australia has just appeared look more at the FPI validity:
Criterion Validation of Four Criteria of the Foot Posture Index
Reliability of the Foot Posture Index and Traditional Measures of Foot Position
My opinion on the Foot Posture Index (FPI):
We use it a lot in research. We use it a lot as part of the inclusion criteria for our orthotic studies (eg we may only recruit those with a Foot Posture Index greater than, say, 6 --> this probably indicates that these people would have probably got foot orthotics if they had symptoms related to a pronated foot --> anything >4-5 on the Foot Posture Index is a pronated foot). The the end of the day, the Foot Posture Index is good for what it is designed for. Like a lot of tools its not good for what it is not designed for.
Back to home
Labels:
foot biomechanics
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)